Absolute viscosity at 60 °C: this is the grade
800 to 1200 poise by IS 1206 (Part 2) or ASTM D2171 — the one two-sided limit in the table, and the only line that actually classifies the cargo. The other seven are there to catch a binder that reaches the right band for the wrong reasons. Omit this measurement and no combination of the remaining results can show that a parcel is VG-10 rather than something that merely resembles it. That gap bites harder on the soft grade than on the hard ones, because the two properties a buyer can check quickly and cheaply — penetration and softening point — are precisely the properties on which a genuine VG-10 and an ordinary soft penetration-grade bitumen look alike.
Kinematic viscosity at 135 °C: minimum 250 cSt, the lowest floor in the standard
Measured by gravity flow through a capillary viscometer to IS 1206 (Part 3) or ASTM D2170. The 250 cSt minimum is the lowest of the four grades, and like the others it is written as a floor rather than a ceiling. The reasoning is that the 60 °C band has already fixed how stiff the binder will be inside the pavement, which leaves the 135 °C floor to police the other end of the curve: it rejects material that reads correctly at service temperature and then thins out too far once it is heated for work. On VG-10 that guard earns its keep, because pulling a heavier residue down into an 800 to 1200 poise band by fluxing is a cheaper route to the grade than producing to it, and the result sprays badly, drains off chippings and emulsifies inconsistently.
Penetration at 25 °C: minimum 80 dmm, and no ceiling
IS 1203, the same test as ASTM D5 and EN 1426. Eighty dmm is the highest penetration minimum in IS 73:2013 and it does two jobs at once. It excludes stiff material that has been dragged into the viscosity band with a diluent, and it puts a floor under the low-temperature flexibility that spray seals and emulsion residues depend on. There is no upper limit, so a fully compliant VG-10 batch may report 95 or 110 dmm. Buyers who want an 80/100-style ceiling should understand they are adding a requirement the standard does not contain. That is entirely legitimate on a manufacturing feedstock where batch-to-batch consistency matters, but it has to be written into the contract rather than assumed.
Softening point: minimum 40 °C, and what it rules out
Ring and ball, IS 1205 or ASTM D36, and the lowest floor in the family: 40 °C against 45 for VG-20, 47 for VG-30 and 50 for VG-40. This line is the clearest statement of what VG-10 is not. A binder permitted down to 40 °C has no business carrying channelised heavy traffic on a hot-climate carriageway, and no mix design compensates for that. Paired with penetration it also does authenticity work at almost no cost. VG-10 is the only grade in the standard that combines a high penetration floor with a low softening point floor, so a genuine straight-run parcel normally clears both with room to spare. The combination to question is a high softening point sitting beside a penetration hovering at 80 dmm, because air-blowing lifts softening point far faster than it drives penetration down. Blown residue can be coaxed into looking like a soft paving binder on a data sheet and then behaves nothing like one in a seal or in a colloid mill.
Flash point: minimum 220 °C, and where that number stops applying
Cleveland open cup, IS 1448 (P:69) or ASTM D92. IS 73:2013 applies the same 220 °C floor to all four grades and production material normally tests well above it. Two points are specific to VG-10. First, the grade is sprayed, and spraying is done near the top of its working temperature range, so the margin between operating temperature and the flash point floor is narrower here than in mixing work. Second, and far more important: once VG-10 has been fluxed into a cutback, the flash point of the finished product is a completely different number measured by a different method — Tag open cup, ASTM D3143 — and it is far lower. The 220 °C figure belongs to the base binder and travels no further than the blending tank.
Solubility in trichloroethylene: the 99.0 % floor and why it matters most here
Measured to IS 1216 or ASTM D2042. The sample is dissolved in trichloroethylene and no more than one part in a hundred may be left behind; whatever fails to dissolve was never bitumen in the first place. On VG-10 the line does more work than it does on a hard grade. Soft material is the easiest stock in the trade to bulk out with mineral filler, and a needle dropped into an extended soft binder will still return a plausible penetration figure, so solubility is frequently the only line on the certificate that catches it. The test is quick and cheap, which makes its absence a finding rather than an oversight.
Viscosity ratio at 60 °C after RTFOT: maximum 4.0
A film of binder is rolled and heated in an oven to IS 9382, the Indian equivalent of ASTM D2872, after which the aged residue goes back into the vacuum capillary viscometer and its 60 °C viscosity is expressed as a multiple of the original figure. The Indian standard calls for the rolling test, not the older static thin film oven test, so a TFOT result — or a loss-on-heating and retained-penetration pair — is not a substitute line on an IS 73:2013 certificate. It may describe perfectly good bitumen, but it does not evidence compliance with the standard the buyer named. A ratio close to 4.0 on a VG-10 tells you the binder hardens rapidly under heat and air, which is a poor property in a grade that is held hot, sprayed, and in drum trade re-melted at destination before it is ever used.
Ductility at 25 °C on the RTFOT residue: minimum 75 cm
Measured to IS 1208 or ASTM D113 by stretching a briquette of the aged residue at 5 cm/min until the thread breaks. Seventy-five centimetres is the most demanding residual ductility requirement in IS 73:2013 — VG-20 requires 50 cm, VG-30 requires 40 cm and VG-40 only 25 cm — and it is the line that defines the character of the grade. A soft binder that has lost its stretch after ageing is not really a soft binder; it is a heavier stock that was fluxed into the band, and it will disappoint as a seal binder and as an emulsion base. If one line on a VG-10 certificate is worth insisting on, it is this one. One caution on arithmetic. This 75 cm is measured after ageing, whereas the 100 cm minimum printed on penetration-grade export sheets is measured on binder straight from the tank. They are not the same test on the same material, and a tender evaluation that ranks a 100 cm unaged figure above a 75 cm aged one has compared nothing at all.
What a defensible VG-10 certificate contains
All eight lines above, each with a measured number and the test method named beside it, on a batch-specific document. Gaps tend to appear in the same two places: the 60 °C viscosity, because a vacuum capillary bench is a far larger investment than a penetrometer and many road laboratories simply do not own one, and the RTFOT pair, because the oven run and the follow-on tests consume both time and sample. Where those are absent, what you are holding is a penetration-grade certificate with a viscosity-grade heading typed above it. Chase the missing lines while the cargo is still at load port, and on a feedstock purchase in particular have an independent inspector draw and seal retained samples that both parties hold, so a later laboratory result can be tied back to the parcel it came from instead of argued over. The certificate of analysis reference sets out what a complete document looks like, and the test methods reference describes each procedure.